Bostjan Skufca posted on Fri, 25 Sep 2015 16:34:16 +0200 as excerpted: > Similar here: I am sticking with 3.19.2 which has proven to work fine > for me (backup systems with btrfs on lvm, lots of snapshots/subvolumes > and occasional rebalance, no fancy/fresh stuff like btrfs-raid, online > compression or subvolume quota, though this last one is tempting in my > use case). On that last one, subvolume quota, you've been following list discussion, right? Just in case you haven't... Btrfs quotas have been an incredibly tough feature to stabilize. They're on the third rewrite and still have some major bugs to fix, so I'd say at least a couple more kernel cycles, then check again before using the feature. So, unless you're actively testing and reporting bugs in that specific feature (in which case, thanks and please continue! =:^), I continue to strongly recommend leaving quotas off for now, as I have been for a year or more, now. -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
