On Friday 25 September 2015 13:51:34 Hugo Mills wrote: > On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 03:36:18PM +0200, Sjoerd wrote: > > Thanks all for the feedback. Still doubting though to go for 4.2.1 or not. > > Main reason is that I am currently running 4.1.7 on my laptop which seems > > to work fine and had some issues with the 4.2.0 kernel. No issues I thing > > that were btrfs related, but more related to my nvidia card. Anyway > > switching back to 4.1.7 resolved those, so I am a bit holding back to try > > the 4.2.1 version ;) > > Anyway I'll see and can always revert back if I don't like it ;) > > If 4.1.7 is working OK for you, stick with it. It's getting much > less important now, as btrfs matures, to keep up with the _very_ > latest. Purely on gut feeling about issues we see on IRC and here, > 3.19 or later would be reasonable at the moment. > OK i'll stick with the longterm 4.1.x branch then.. > Compared to, say, 3 or 4 years ago when running late -rc kernels > was often preferable to running the latest stable, and things have > improved quite a bit. :) Good to know and thanks for the feedback :) Cheers, Sjoerd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
