On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 05:29:37PM +0100, Luis de Bethencourt wrote: > These two patches fix instances where -1 is used to specify a buffer > allocation fail, instead of using -ENOMEM. > > I could merge the two patches into one if that's more appropriate. No, it's better to change them separately. If you change the return value, also look at all the callers so you can see the impact of the change and count that into the "size of the patch". -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
