On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 7:21 AM, Austin S Hemmelgarn <ahferroin7@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > It's not a bad idea, except that it changes established usage, and there are > probably some people out there who depend on the current behavior. If we do > go that way, mount needs to spit out a big obnoxious warning (as in, not > through dmesg or mount options, but directly on stderr) if the filesystem > gets mounted degraded automatically. Definitely there needs to be a user space message. Even now when trying to mount a volume with a missing device without -o degraded the generic fs type unrecognized message is misleading. > A better option might be to add a > compat feature bit, and if that bit is set, then use the above logic, > otherwise use the current logic. Yeah opt-in rather than opt-out. -- Chris Murphy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
