On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 11:58:45AM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 4:42 AM, Hugo Mills <hugo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 05, 2015 at 12:13:30PM +0200, Ivan Petrovic wrote: > > >> So you're saying that I can't make first and third partition to work > >> with it's data? Maybe I'll try with btrfs-restore, do you think it can > >> rescue this 2 drives? > > > > Unlikely. Like I said, if the FS was using single storage for > > everything, a random 33% of the filesystem has gone away. There's > > probably not enough of it left to make anything coherent. > > With single profile for everything, is metadata and data guaranteed to > be co-located on the same device? If not, then there's no way for this > to be recovered. If they are, then I think recovery would depend on > the system chunk always being device-n mirrored, which we don't have. No, there's no guarantee of co-location of data and metadata. Hugo. -- Hugo Mills | UNIX: Italian pen maker hugo@... carfax.org.uk | http://carfax.org.uk/ | PGP: E2AB1DE4 |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
