Only comment, not big issue.
And remove no-use aggument in block_group_free_all_extent().
Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
chunk-recover.c | 9 ++++-----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/chunk-recover.c b/chunk-recover.c
index 7698ee0..1d8fe81 100644
--- a/chunk-recover.c
+++ b/chunk-recover.c
@@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ again:
list_del_init(&exist->list);
free(exist);
/*
- * We must do seach again to avoid the following cache.
+ * We must do search again to avoid the following cache.
* /--old bg 1--//--old bg 2--/
* /--new bg--/
*/
@@ -1092,8 +1092,7 @@ err:
return ret;
}
-static int block_group_free_all_extent(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
- struct btrfs_root *root,
+static int block_group_free_all_extent(struct btrfs_root *root,
struct block_group_record *bg)
{
struct btrfs_block_group_cache *cache;
@@ -1133,7 +1132,7 @@ static int remove_chunk_extent_item(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
if (ret)
return ret;
- ret = block_group_free_all_extent(trans, root, chunk->bg_rec);
+ ret = block_group_free_all_extent(root, chunk->bg_rec);
if (ret)
return ret;
}
@@ -2310,7 +2309,7 @@ static void validate_rebuild_chunks(struct recover_control *rc)
}
/*
- * Return 0 when succesful, < 0 on error and > 0 if aborted by user
+ * Return 0 when successful, < 0 on error and > 0 if aborted by user
*/
int btrfs_recover_chunk_tree(char *path, int verbose, int yes)
{
--
1.8.5.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
