for() is more suitable than while() in this code block.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
chunk-recover.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/chunk-recover.c b/chunk-recover.c
index 832b3b1..66a4ce6 100644
--- a/chunk-recover.c
+++ b/chunk-recover.c
@@ -871,8 +871,7 @@ static int scan_devices(struct recover_control *rc)
devidx++;
}
- i = 0;
- while (i < devidx) {
+ for (i = 0; i < devidx; i++) {
ret = pthread_join(t_scans[i], (void **)&t_rets[i]);
if (ret || t_rets[i]) {
ret = 1;
@@ -880,7 +879,6 @@ static int scan_devices(struct recover_control *rc)
cancel_to = devnr - 1;
goto out1;
}
- i++;
}
out1:
while (ret && (cancel_from <= cancel_to)) {
--
1.8.5.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
