On Fri, 28 Aug 2015 07:35:02 PM Hugo Mills wrote: > On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 10:50:12AM +0200, George Duffield wrote: > > Running a traditional raid5 array of that size is statistically > > guaranteed to fail in the event of a rebuild. > > Except that if it were, you wouldn't see anyone running RAID-5 > arrays of that size and (considerably) larger. And successfully > replacing devices in them. Let's not assume that everyone who thinks that they are "successfully" running a RAID-5 array is actually doing so. One of the features of BTRFS is that you won't get undetected data corruption. -- My Main Blog http://etbe.coker.com.au/ My Documents Blog http://doc.coker.com.au/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
