It is better to show error stats to user when we found tree block
spanning stripes.
On a btrfs created by old version of btrfs-convert:
Before patch:
# btrfs scrub start -B /dev/vdh
scrub done for 8b342d35-2904-41ab-b3cb-2f929709cf47
scrub started at Tue Aug 25 21:19:09 2015 and finished after 00:00:00
total bytes scrubbed: 53.54MiB with 0 errors
# dmesg
...
[ 128.711434] BTRFS error (device vdh): scrub: tree block 27054080 spanning stripes, ignored. logical=27000832
[ 128.712744] BTRFS error (device vdh): scrub: tree block 27054080 spanning stripes, ignored. logical=27066368
...
After patch:
# btrfs scrub start -B /dev/vdh
scrub done for ff7f844b-7a4e-4b1a-88a9-8252ab25be1b
scrub started at Tue Aug 25 21:42:29 2015 and finished after 00:00:00
total bytes scrubbed: 53.60MiB with 2 errors
error details:
corrected errors: 0, uncorrectable errors: 2, unverified errors: 0
ERROR: There are uncorrectable errors.
# dmesg
...omit...
#
Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/btrfs/scrub.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
index c69c75e..81482e4 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
@@ -3025,6 +3025,9 @@ static noinline_for_stack int scrub_raid56_parity(struct scrub_ctx *sctx,
logic_start + map->stripe_len)) {
btrfs_err(fs_info, "scrub: tree block %llu spanning stripes, ignored. logical=%llu",
key.objectid, logic_start);
+ spin_lock(&sctx->stat_lock);
+ sctx->stat.uncorrectable_errors++;
+ spin_unlock(&sctx->stat_lock);
goto next;
}
again:
@@ -3374,6 +3377,9 @@ static noinline_for_stack int scrub_stripe(struct scrub_ctx *sctx,
"scrub: tree block %llu spanning "
"stripes, ignored. logical=%llu",
key.objectid, logical);
+ spin_lock(&sctx->stat_lock);
+ sctx->stat.uncorrectable_errors++;
+ spin_unlock(&sctx->stat_lock);
goto next;
}
--
1.8.5.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
