Re: So, wipe it out and start over or keep debugging?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I ran the following command.  It spent a lot of time creating a
1672450048 byte file.  Then it stopped writing to the file and started
using 100% CPU.  It's currently doing no I/O, and it's been doing that
for a while now.  Is that supposed to happen?

On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Timothy Normand Miller
<theosib@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In that case, do I need to do all four block devices separately, or
> will the tool figure it out?
>
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 7:21 AM, Austin S Hemmelgarn
> <ahferroin7@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 2015-08-17 14:52, Timothy Normand Miller wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm not sure if I'm doing this wrong.  Here's what I'm seeing:
>>>
>>> # btrfs-image -c9 -t4 -w /mnt/btrfs ~/btrfs_dump.z
>>> Superblock bytenr is larger than device size
>>> Open ctree failed
>>> create failed (No such file or directory)
>>
>>
>> For the source, you need to specify the underlying block device, not the top
>> of the mounted filesystem.  It's trying to read the directory as a block
>> device and getting very confused.  We should probably add some kind of check
>> to btrfs-image to warn about that.
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Timothy Normand Miller, PhD
> Assistant Professor of Computer Science, Binghamton University
> http://www.cs.binghamton.edu/~millerti/
> Open Graphics Project



-- 
Timothy Normand Miller, PhD
Assistant Professor of Computer Science, Binghamton University
http://www.cs.binghamton.edu/~millerti/
Open Graphics Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux