On Sat, 15 Aug 2015 07:40:40 +0800, Anand Jain wrote: > Hello, > > as of now btrfs sysfs does not include the attributes for the volume > manager part in its sysfs layout, so its being developed and there are > two types of layout here below, so I have a quick survey to know which > will be preferred. contenders are: > 1. FS and VM (volume manager) attributes[1] merged sysfs layout > > /sys/fs/btrfs/<fsid> <-- holds FS attr, VM attr will be added here. > /sys/fs/btrfs/<fsid>/devices/<uuid [2] > <-- btrfs_devices attr here My vote is for the first one. Lengthening the UI/API with /pools/ seems unnecessary, and it's better to get attributes exposed earlier. > 2. FS and VM attributes separated sysfs layout. > > /sys/fs/btrfs/<fsid> <--- as is, will continue to hold fs attributes. > /sys/fs/btrfs/pools/<fsid>/ <-- will hold VM attributes > /sys/fs/btrfs/pools/<fsid>/devices/<sdx> <-- btrfs_devices attr here -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
