Hi, Does anyone know the reason subvolumes are not called just volumes? I mean, the top subvolume is not called a volume, so there is nothing to be "sub" of. Also, what is the penalty of a subvolume compared to a directory? From a design perspective, couldn't all directories just be subvolumes? Martin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
