On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 6:39 PM, Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Oh, you were using trace-cmd, that's why the data is so huge. Oh, I thought it was just automating the work for me, but without any sort of impact. > > I was originally hoping you just copy the trace file, which is human > readable and not so huge. If you mean something like the ouput of trace-cmd report, it was actually bigger than the dat files (about twice the size) that's why I shared the dats instead. If you want the reports instead I'll gladly share them. > > But that's OK anyway. > > I'll try to analyse it to find a clue if possible. > > Thanks, > Qu Great thank you! By the way, I just thought of a few things to mention. This btrfs partition is an ext4 converted partition, and I hit the same behavior as these guys under heavy load: http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg44660.html http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg44191.html I don't think it's related to the crash, but maybe to the conversion? Thanks Qu! John -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
