On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Sonic <sonicsmith@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Is "btrfs rescue super-recover" safe to run? IOW, will it ask before > doing anything possibly destructive (assuming I don't give it a -y)? Seemed a bit safe so I went for it and: sartre ~ # btrfs rescue super-recover /dev/sdc All supers are valid, no need to recover sartre ~ # btrfs rescue super-recover /dev/sde All supers are valid, no need to recover So it may not be a superblock issue. >From the dmesg earlier: [ 3421.193734] BTRFS (device sde): bad tree block start 8330001001141004672 20971520 [ 3421.193738] BTRFS: failed to read chunk root on sde [ 3421.203221] BTRFS: open_ctree failed I may need a chunk-recover and also wonder if zero-log is advisable. Any ideas in those directions? Thanks, Chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
