Re: btrfs subvolume clone or fork (btrfs-progs feature request)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote (ao):
> On 2015-07-09 08:41, Sander wrote:
> >Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote (ao):
> >>>What's wrong with "btrfs subvolume snapshot"?
> >>
> >>Well, personally I would say the fact that once something is tagged as
> >>a snapshot, you can't change it to a regular subvolume without doing a
> >>non-incremental send/receive.
> >
> >A snapshot is a subvolume. There is no such thing as "tagged as a
> >snapshot".
> >
> >	Sander
> >
> No, there is a bit in the subvolume metadata that says whether it's
> considered a snapshot or not.  Internally, they are handled identically, but
> it does come into play when you consider things like btrfs subvolume show -s
> (which only lists snapshots), which in turn means that certain tasks are
> more difficult to script robustly.

I stand corrected. Thanks for the info.

	Sander
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux