Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] Revert "Btrfs: incremental send, remove dead code"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 04:09:07PM +0100, Filipe David Manana wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Robbie Ko <robbieko@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > This reverts commit 5f806c3ae2ff6263a10a6901f97abb74dac03d36.
> >
> > This is a necessary patch for a subsequent patch in the series (patch 3).
> 
> Still confused.
> Reverting that commit (5f806c3ae2ff6263a10a6901f97abb74dac03d36) alone
> will fix any issue?
> Reading the part below gives that understanding, but it's basically a
> trimmed down version of the scenario/problem mentioned in patch 3, so
> it doesn't seem, nor it's clear, that this revert alone fixes any
> problem.

If it's only to re-introduce the path_loop helper alone, then the revert
is indeed confusing.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux