Re: [PATCH 3/5] btrfs: fix clone / extent-same deadlocks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 03:47:40PM -0700, Mark Fasheh wrote:
> Clone and extent same lock their source and target inodes in opposite order.
> In addition to this, the range locking in clone doesn't take ordering into
> account. Fix this by having clone use the same locking helpers as
> btrfs-extent-same.
> 
> In addition, I do a small cleanup of the locking helpers, removing a case
> (both inodes being the same) which was poorly accounted for and never
> actually used by the callers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@xxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux