From: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
The code in workqueue only do fast initialization and submit a bio
in end, plus, it will not called in interrupe context, no need to
queue a work for this type of work.
Call it directly will make code simple, easy to debug and reduce
potential problem.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/btrfs/raid56.c | 19 +------------------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/raid56.c b/fs/btrfs/raid56.c
index fa72068..eea86d1 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/raid56.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/raid56.c
@@ -2557,7 +2557,7 @@ static void raid56_parity_scrub_end_io(struct bio *bio, int err)
validate_rbio_for_parity_scrub(rbio);
}
-static void raid56_parity_scrub_stripe(struct btrfs_raid_bio *rbio)
+static void async_scrub_parity(struct btrfs_raid_bio *rbio)
{
int bios_to_read = 0;
struct bio_list bio_list;
@@ -2646,23 +2646,6 @@ finish:
validate_rbio_for_parity_scrub(rbio);
}
-static void scrub_parity_work(struct btrfs_work *work)
-{
- struct btrfs_raid_bio *rbio;
-
- rbio = container_of(work, struct btrfs_raid_bio, work);
- raid56_parity_scrub_stripe(rbio);
-}
-
-static void async_scrub_parity(struct btrfs_raid_bio *rbio)
-{
- btrfs_init_work(&rbio->work, btrfs_rmw_helper,
- scrub_parity_work, NULL, NULL);
-
- btrfs_queue_work(rbio->fs_info->rmw_workers,
- &rbio->work);
-}
-
void raid56_parity_submit_scrub_rbio(struct btrfs_raid_bio *rbio)
{
if (!lock_stripe_add(rbio))
--
1.8.5.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
