From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@xxxxxxxx> The comment was not correct about the part where it says the endio callback of the bio might have not yet been called - update it to mention that by that time the endio callback execution might still be in progress only. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@xxxxxxxx> --- fs/btrfs/inode.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c index 855935f..a21ad34 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c @@ -4989,8 +4989,9 @@ static void evict_inode_truncate_pages(struct inode *inode) /* * Keep looping until we have no more ranges in the io tree. * We can have ongoing bios started by readpages (called from readahead) - * that didn't get their end io callbacks called yet or they are still - * in progress ((extent_io.c:end_bio_extent_readpage()). This means some + * that have their endio callback (extent_io.c:end_bio_extent_readpage) + * still in progress (unlocked the pages in the bio but did not yet + * unlocked the ranges in the io tree). Therefore this means some * ranges can still be locked and eviction started because before * submitting those bios, which are executed by a separate task (work * queue kthread), inode references (inode->i_count) were not taken -- 2.1.3 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
