Re: [GIT PULL] Qgroup rework with other Fujitsu fix.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/09/2015 10:23 AM, adam900710 wrote:
Sorry, forgot to reply to all.

To Josef,

I am afraid that your conclusion is not right, as in the patch, it will
only merge delayed refs when they are in same sequence number.

In fact, in the patch, conditions for merge is even more restrict than
before, it will not allow merging delayed refs for the same extent if
there are other delayed refs between them.


You're right, I missed this bit

+	if (exist->type != ref->type || exist->no_quota != ref->no_quota ||
+	    exist->seq != ref->seq)
+		goto add_tail;

I don't want the merging more strict, I want to merge as much as possible, this was the problem with the original qgroup work and that's why I reworked all this sequence number crap. Thanks,

Josef
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux