[PATCH] Btrfs: btrfs_defrag_file: Fix ra_index computation.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Read-ahead is done for the pages in the range [ra_index, ra_index + cluster -
1]. So the next read-ahead should be starting from the page at index 'ra_index
+ cluster' (unless we deemed that the extent at 'ra_index + cluster' as
non-defraggable) rather than from the page at index 'ra_index +
max_cluster'. This patch fixes this. I did run the xfstests suite to make sure
that the code does not regress.

Signed-off-by: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
index ca5d968..3ddd74a 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
@@ -1368,7 +1368,7 @@ int btrfs_defrag_file(struct inode *inode, struct file *file,
 			ra_index = max(i, ra_index);
 			btrfs_force_ra(inode->i_mapping, ra, file, ra_index,
 				       cluster);
-			ra_index += max_cluster;
+			ra_index += cluster;
 		}
 
 		mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
-- 
2.1.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux