Re: [PATCH] btrfs: Handle unaligned length in extent_same

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 11:36:25PM +0000, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Jun 2015 15:05:25 -0700, Mark Fasheh wrote:
> 
> > The extent-same code rejects requests with an unaligned length. This
> > poses a problem when we want to dedupe the tail extent of files as we
> > skip cloning the portion between i_size and the extent boundary.
> 
> This sounds familiar:
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/42512
> 
> Same problem?

Yes! I CC'd Matt, I think either of the patches needs a review for
inclusion. I can help by reviewing his (at least a reviewed-by tag would
probably help).

Incidentally, I have a duperemove branch to take advantage of the better
behavior:

https://github.com/markfasheh/duperemove/tree/alignment_fix
	--Mark

--
Mark Fasheh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux