Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH] block: add a bi_error field to struct bio

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "Christoph" == Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> writes:

Christoph> The first one has the drawback of only communicating a single
Christoph> possible error (-EIO), and the second one has the drawback of
Christoph> not beeing persistent when bios are queued up, and are not
Christoph> passed along from child to parent bio in the ever more
Christoph> popular chaining scenario.

Christoph> So add a new bi_error field to store an errno value directly
Christoph> in struct bio and remove the existing mechanisms to clean all
Christoph> this up.

Having the error status separate from the bio has been a major headache.
I am entirely in favor of this patch.

It was a big chunk of changes to read through but I did not spot any
obvious problems or polarity reversals. It would be nice to get the
respective fs/md/target driver folks to check their portions, though.

Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux