Jan Voet posted on Thu, 21 May 2015 21:43:36 +0000 as excerpted: > I recently upgraded a quite old home NAS system (Celeron M based) to > Ubuntu 14.04 with an upgraded linux kernel (3.19.8) and BTRFS tools > v3.17. > This system has 5 brand new 6TB drives (HGST) with all drives directly > handled by BTRFS, both data and metadata in RAID5. FWIW, btrfs raid5 (and raid6, together called raid56 mode) is still extremely new, only normal runtime implemented as originally introduced, with complete repair from a device failure only completely implemented in kernel 3.19, and while in theory complete, that implementation is still very immature and poorly tested, and *WILL* have bugs, one of which you may very well have found. For in-production use, therefore, btrfs raid56 mode, while now at least in theory complete, is really too immature at this point to recommend. I'd recommend either btrfs raid1 or raid10 modes as more stable within btrfs at this point, tho by the end of this year or early next, I predict raid56 mode to have stabilized to about that of the rest of btrfs, which is to say, not entirely stable, but heading that way. IOW, for btrfs in general, the sysadmin's backup rule that if you don't have backups by definition you don't care about the data regardless of claims to the contrary, and untested would-be backups aren't backups until you complete them by testing that they can be read and restored from, continues to apply even more than to more stable filesystems, and keeping up with current is still very important as by doing so you're avoiding known and already fixed bugs. Given those constraints, btrfs is /in/ /general/ usable. But not yet raid56 mode, which I'd definitely consider to still be breakable at any time. So certainly for the multi-TB of data you're dealing with, which you say yourself takes some time (and is thus not something you can afford to backup and restore trivially), I'd say stay off btrf raid56 until around the end of the year or early next, at which point it should have stabilized. Until then, consider either btrfs raid1 mode (which I use), or for that amount of data, more likely btrfs raid10 mode. Or if you must keep raid5 due to device and data size limitations, consider sticking with mdraid5 or similar, for now, potentially with btrfs on top, or perhaps with the more stable xfs or ext3/4 (or my favorite reiserfs, which I have found /extremely/ reliable here, even with less than absolutely reliable hardware, the old tales about it being unreliable were from pre-data=ordered times, but that's early kernel 2.4 era and thus rather ancient history, now, but as they say, YMMV...). -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
