Re: Btrfs and integration with GNU ++

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
<roy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Interesting - which ones is it that's doing this?
>>>
>> While I don't know of any that use it by _default_ yet, I do know that
>> it is an easy to use option on most of the big non-comercial distros
>> already (Debian, Fedora, Ubuntu, etc.), and a couple (Gentoo, Arch, and
>> possibly Slackware) have had the option to use it since it went mainline
>> (although that is just a side effect of the installation procedures, not
>> any kind of active attempt at support).
>
> Seems CentOS 7 also allows for btrfs installs. Wonder if RHEL7 also would do that. Gotta test one day...

Also, those CentOS/RHEL 7 kernels are old by Btrfs standards. You
should consider using elrepo kernels (they have kernel 4.0.3 and 4.0.4
right now), and if you can't do that, then I wouldn't use Btrfs, use
XFS instead with those 3.10.x kernels.

-- 
Chris Murphy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux