On 2015-05-19 03:24, Russell Coker wrote:
It's only dangerous if fsck changed anything and you then try to use the filesystem without umounting it and dropping caches or rebooting. I have had issues in the past with metadata corruption in such cases.Do you have a reference for fsck on a ro mounted ext4 filesystem being dangerous? The standard behavior of Linux systems has been to fsck a ro mounted ext* root filesystem since long before an initrd was invented.
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
