Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: incremental send, fix clone operations for compressed extents

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, May 03, 2015 at 01:56:00AM +0100, Filipe Manana wrote:
> Marc reported a problem where the receiving end of an incremental send
> was performing clone operations that failed with -EINVAL. This happened
> because, unlike for uncompressed extents, we were not checking if the
> source clone offset and length, after summing the data offset, falls
> within the source file's boundaries.
> 
> So make sure we do such checks when attempting to issue clone operations
> for compressed extents.
> 
> Problem reproducible with the following steps:
> 
>   $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb
>   $ mount -o compress /dev/sdb /mnt
>   $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc
>   $ mount -o compress /dev/sdc /mnt2
> 
>   # Create the file with a single extent of 128K. This creates a metadata file
>   # extent item with a data start offset of 0 and a logical length of 128K.
>   $ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xaa 64K 128K" -c "fsync" /mnt/foo
> 
>   # Now rewrite the range 64K to 112K of our file. This will make the inode's
>   # metadata continue to point to the 128K extent we created before, but now
>   # with an extent item that points to the extent with a data start offset of
>   # 112K and a logical length of 16K.
>   # That metadata file extent item is associated with the logical file offset
>   # at 176K and covers the logical file range 176K to 192K.
>   $ xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xbb 64K 112K" -c "fsync" /mnt/foo
> 
>   # Now rewrite the range 180K to 12K. This will make the inode's metadata
>   # continue to point the the 128K extent we created earlier, with a single
>   # extent item that points to it with a start offset of 112K and a logical
>   # length of 4K.
>   # That metadata file extent item is associated with the logical file offset
>   # at 176K and covers the logical file range 176K to 180K.
>   $ xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xcc 180K 12K" -c "fsync" /mnt/foo
> 
>   $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1
> 
>   $ touch /mnt/bar
>   # Calls the btrfs clone ioctl.
>   $ ~/xfstests/src/cloner -s $((176 * 1024)) -d $((176 * 1024)) \
>     -l $((4 * 1024)) /mnt/foo /mnt/bar
> 
>   $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2
> 
>   $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 | btrfs receive /mnt2
>   At subvol /mnt/snap1
>   At subvol snap1
> 
>   $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 | btrfs receive /mnt2
>   At subvol /mnt/snap2
>   At snapshot snap2
>   ERROR: failed to clone extents to bar
>   Invalid argument
> 
> A test case for fstests follows soon.
> 
> Reported-by: Marc MERLIN <marc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Marc MERLIN <marc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@xxxxxxxx>

Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux