On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 04:51:37PM +0200, David Sterba wrote: > On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 02:42:58AM -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote: > > Sorry for the long-winded email! Thoughts, David, Qu? > > I'm ok with the approach and the patchset as a whole. There was one > minor issue with the aliasing of the toplevel subvolume (id 0 or 5). > I'll post a comment to the patch. Thanks a lot for the review, I appreciate it. I had to resolve a couple of minor conflicts rebasing this on v4.1-rc3 (due to the dentry->d_inode to d_inode(dentry) conversion), so I can resend this soon if there are aren't any other issues. -- Omar -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
