On 05/05/2015 11:38 PM, David Sterba wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 05:07:24PM +0800, xuw2015@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: George Wang <xuw2015@xxxxxxxxx>
First try to find the device matches specified device path, if nothing, then
find the device by (devid, dev_uuid). This can fix the regression for
replacing an offline device which path is held in btrfs_device.
I vaguely remember similar patches sent by Anand, CCed.
George,
Critically we don't need this patch. right ?
Anyway user of replace cli can use devid if device read fails.
I think David is talking about:
[PATCH] device delete by devid
it was critical for device delete. since there was device
delete by devid. I used device delete by devid instead of
device path strcmp mainly because to maintain consistency
between device replace and delete.
the above patch set also provides code cleanups between
device replace and delete codes.
Thanks, Anand
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
