On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 10:09 PM, Davide Italiano <dccitaliano@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> - We call inode_size_ok() only if FL_KEEP_SIZE isn't specified.
> - As an optimisation we can skip the call if (off + len)
> isn't greater than the current size of the file. This operation
> is called under the lock so the less work we do, the better.
> - If we call inode_size_ok() pass to it the correct value rather
> than a more conservative estimation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Davide Italiano <dccitaliano@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/file.c | 10 +++++++---
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file.c b/fs/btrfs/file.c
> index 30982bb..f649bfc 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/file.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/file.c
> @@ -2586,9 +2586,13 @@ static long btrfs_fallocate(struct file *file, int mode,
> }
>
> mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
> - ret = inode_newsize_ok(inode, alloc_end);
> - if (ret)
> - goto out;
> +
> + if (!(mode & FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE) &&
> + offset + len > inode->i_size) {
> + ret = inode_newsize_ok(inode, offset + len);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out;
> + }
>
> if (alloc_start > inode->i_size) {
> ret = btrfs_cont_expand(inode, i_size_read(inode),
> --
> 2.3.4
>
Any comment on this?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
