Re: The FAQ on fsync/O_SYNC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 20 Apr 2015, Craig Ringer <craig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> PostgreSQL is its self copy-on-write (because of multi-version
> concurrency control), so it doesn't make much sense to have the FS
> doing another layer of COW.

That's a matter of opinion.

I think it's great if PostgreSQL can do internal checkums and error 
correction.  But I'd rather not have to test that functionality in the field.

Really I prefer to have the ZFS copies= option for databases.

-- 
My Main Blog         http://etbe.coker.com.au/
My Documents Blog    http://doc.coker.com.au/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux