Re: [PATCH 1/1] btrfs-progs: improve troubleshooting avoid duplicate error strings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 08:37:01PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
> my troubleshooting experience says have unique error string per module.
> 
> In the below eg, its one additional step to know error line,
> 
> cat -n cmds-device.c | egrep "error removing the device"
>    185	"ERROR: error removing the device '%s' - %s\n",
>    190	"ERROR: error removing the device '%s' - %s\n",
> 
> which is completely avoidable.

It is, we can merge both branches into one.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  cmds-device.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/cmds-device.c b/cmds-device.c
> index 1c72e90..1c32771 100644
> --- a/cmds-device.c
> +++ b/cmds-device.c
> @@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ static int cmd_rm_dev(int argc, char **argv)
>  			ret++;
>  		} else if (res < 0) {
>  			fprintf(stderr,
> -				"ERROR: error removing the device '%s' - %s\n",
> +				"ERROR: ioctl error removing the device '%s' - %s\n",

The only difference is the strerror vs btrfs_err_str. As both ret > 0
and ret < 0 report some kind of error, the wording would be very similar
so I think that one error message would fit better. I'll fix that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux