Re: [PATCH/RFC] fscache/cachefiles versus btrfs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx> wrote:

>  Is there a better way?  Could a better way be created?  Maybe
>  SEEK_DATA_RELIABLE ??

fiemap() maybe?

> Also, if you do try to use fscache on btrfs with 3.19, then nothing gets
> cached (as expected) and with a heavy load you can lose a race and get an
> asserting fail in fscache_enqueue_operation

Do you have the patches here applied?

	http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/linux-fs.git/log/?h=fscache-fixes

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux