On Sun, 2015-03-29 at 16:44 +0200, Kai Krakow wrote: > Yes, the chosen "default" is probably not the best for this kind of utility. > But I suppose it follows the principle of least surprise. At least every > utility I'm daily using (like find) follows this default route. But the default with all these tools is that they operate on the file hierarchy and per default don't care about filesystems at all - or at least not in their original meaning. dedup is IMHO however a more filesystem internal centric operation... more like defragmentation ore tune2fs. Cheers.
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
