On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:39 PM, Nikolaus Rath <Nikolaus@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > Thanks. Does this mean that I risk data corruption when using btrfs with > 4.0-rc3, or is this relatively harmless? I can't answer that. I'd say use 3.18.9 or 3.19.2 if you want reduced risk of corruption, or use the current week's rc (which is rc5) if you can accept a bit more risk for testing purposes. -- Chris Murphy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
