On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 12:57:36PM +0100, Sebastian Thorarensen wrote: > This patch passes `make test', and I have also tested the patched > btrfs-convert on populated ext4 filesystems and reverting back again, > without errors; but note that I have very little experience with ext2/3/4 > and btrfs, so there is a large possibility that I have missed something. > I'm also a bit unsure if my implementation of `ext2_alloc_block_range' is > the best way to find continuous blocks. I think it's right, however I'm not sure if there are any guarantees about the range alignment. Btrfs should be fine with 4k (ie. sectorsize which is PAGE_SIZE) alignment for a node, but this could lead to some pathological layout and I'm not 100% sure the exact nodesize alignment is not required somewhere. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
