On 2015-03-13 23:26, Robert White wrote: > Is there any practical reason to prefer bind mounts or separately > mounting a subvolume? > > e.g. assuming /locationA and /locationB are arbitrarily far apart in the > file system tree, is there any reason to prefer one of the following > over the other > > mount -t btrfs -o subvolume=/thing /dev/sdN1 /locationA > mount --bind /locationA /locationB > > vs. > > mount -t btrfs -o subvolume=/thing /dev/sdN1 /locationA > mount -t btrfs -o subvolume=/thing /dev/sdN1 /locationB > > Are both equally efficient and whatnot? Internally, they're actually identical. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
