Any Arguments for/against --bind mounts?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Is there any practical reason to prefer bind mounts or separately mounting a subvolume?

e.g. assuming /locationA and /locationB are arbitrarily far apart in the file system tree, is there any reason to prefer one of the following over the other

mount -t btrfs -o subvolume=/thing /dev/sdN1 /locationA
mount --bind /locationA /locationB

vs.

mount -t btrfs -o subvolume=/thing /dev/sdN1 /locationA
mount -t btrfs -o subvolume=/thing /dev/sdN1 /locationB

Are both equally efficient and whatnot?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux