If the clone root was not readonly or the dead flag was set on it, we were
leaving without decrementing the root's send_progress counter (and before
we just incremented it). If a concurrent snapshot deletion was in progress
and ended up being aborted, it would be impossible to later attempt to
delete again the snapshot, since the root's send_in_progress counter could
never go back to 0.
We were also setting clone_sources_to_rollback to i + 1 too early - if we
bailed out because the clone root we got is not readonly or flagged as dead
we ended up later derreferencing a null pointer because we didn't assign
the clone root to sctx->clone_roots[i].root:
for (i = 0; sctx && i < clone_sources_to_rollback; i++)
btrfs_root_dec_send_in_progress(
sctx->clone_roots[i].root);
So just don't increment the send_in_progress counter if the root is readonly
or flagged as dead.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@xxxxxxxx>
---
fs/btrfs/send.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/send.c b/fs/btrfs/send.c
index 6ec28f1..571de5a 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/send.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/send.c
@@ -5852,9 +5852,7 @@ long btrfs_ioctl_send(struct file *mnt_file, void __user *arg_)
ret = PTR_ERR(clone_root);
goto out;
}
- clone_sources_to_rollback = i + 1;
spin_lock(&clone_root->root_item_lock);
- clone_root->send_in_progress++;
if (!btrfs_root_readonly(clone_root) ||
btrfs_root_dead(clone_root)) {
spin_unlock(&clone_root->root_item_lock);
@@ -5862,10 +5860,12 @@ long btrfs_ioctl_send(struct file *mnt_file, void __user *arg_)
ret = -EPERM;
goto out;
}
+ clone_root->send_in_progress++;
spin_unlock(&clone_root->root_item_lock);
srcu_read_unlock(&fs_info->subvol_srcu, index);
sctx->clone_roots[i].root = clone_root;
+ clone_sources_to_rollback = i + 1;
}
vfree(clone_sources_tmp);
clone_sources_tmp = NULL;
--
2.1.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
