On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Markus Moeller <huaraz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Thank you for looking at this. I did post the fstab in the original post. Yep! No aware for my observation skills on this thread... > Here it is again: Hmm, it's using UUIDs for the Btrfs volumes rather than using the VG/LV. If you use # lvs that'll show the LVM LV's. But Robert already got this figured out. > The only thing I intended was to separate /, /var, /opt, /usr and /boot as > I was used to, to avoid for example /var/log filling up the root filesystem > ( but now this fails :-( ) /var/log is on system_13.2/root_lv along with a bunch of other things. According to your first df though, this 5GB root_lv is far from full, not even 1/2 full. So I don't have a good explanation. Anyway, long term this layout has maintenance problems, I would start over. Backing up, restoring, even updating will pose problematic. -- Chris Murphy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
