Re: Am I missing partiy/redundancy - WARNING: RAID56 detected, not implemented

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 02:21:24AM -0700, Jeff Smith wrote:
> I am just getting started with btrfs and wanted to test raid5.  I set
> it up and thought it was setup correctly but when I run " btrfs fi
> usage /mnt/btrdata"  I get the message "WARNING: RAID56 detected, not
> implemented".   Does this mean I have no redundancy?  I know it is
> experimental and I am not relying on it for production data (or data
> that cannot be replaced).  I don't think I do.  When I check the free
> space (3.7TB) it is the same as all the drive together (4x931MB).
> 
> 
> Any assistance in helping me understand would be appreciated greatly.
> 
> -----
> btrfs fi usage /mnt/btrdata
> WARNING: RAID56 detected, not implemented
> WARNING: RAID56 detected, not implemented
> WARNING: RAID56 detected, not implemented

The message is confusing, it means that space reporting for raid56 is
not implemted. I'll fix that, thanks for the report.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux