On Mon, 5 Jan 2015 06:21:52 PM Lennart Poettering wrote: > Is this on purpose, or simply an oversight? The only hint I can see that it's deliberate is the comment in fs/btrfs/send.c that says: /* TODO Add otime support when the otime patches get into upstream */ However... > It should be easy to initialize it to the mtime when the inode is > first created... This I agree with, well worth doing anyway. I'll see if I can knock up a patch. All the best, Chris -- Chris Samuel : http://www.csamuel.org/ : Melbourne, VIC -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
