Re: Standards Problems [Was: [PATCH v2 1/3] Btrfs: get more accurate output in df command.]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/27/2014 09:10 AM, Robert White wrote:
On 12/23/2014 04:31 AM, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
On 12/18/2014 12:07 PM, Robert White wrote:
...
Thanx
Yang
. xaE




Fine. but you still haven't told me/us what you thing df (really fsstat() ) should report in those cases.

Go back to that email. Grab some of those cases. Then tell me what your patch will report and why it makes more sense than what is reported now.

For code to be correct it _must_ be correct for the "special" cases. You don't get to just ignore the special cases.

So what are your specific answers to those cases?

Great to hear that we can stop the endless discussion of FS level VS device level.

Then we can come back to discuss the special cases you provided. I give you some answer in another mail. And make a change in my patch to cover the case of un-finished
balance.

Thanx
.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux