On Wed, 31 Dec 2014 09:27:14 AM ashford@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > I see this as a CRITICAL design flaw. The reason for calling it CRITICAL > is that System Administrators have been trained for >20 years that RAID-10 > can usually handle a dual-disk failure, but the BTRFS implementation has > effectively ZERO chance of doing so. I suspect this is a knock-on effect of the fact that (unless this has changed recently & IIRC) RAID-1 with btrfs will only mirrors data over two drives, no matter how many you add to an array. -- Chris Samuel : http://www.csamuel.org/ : Melbourne, VIC -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
