Re: should I use btrfs on Centos 7 for a new production server?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 12/30/14 10:06 PM, Wang Shilong wrote:
>>> I used CentOS7 btrfs myself, just doing some tests..it crashed easily.
>>> I don’t know how much efforts that Redhat do on btrfs for 7 series.
>>
>> Maybe use SUSE enterprise for btrfs will be a better choice, they offered
>> better support for btrfs as far as i know.
>
> I believe SuSE's most recent support statement on btrfs is here, I think.
>
> https://www.suse.com/releasenotes/x86_64/SUSE-SLES/12/#fate-317221

Wow. Suse use btrfs for root by default, but actively prevents user
from using compression (unless specifically overiden using module
parameter)?

Weird, since IIRC compression has been around and stable for a long time.

-- 
Fajar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux