oh, and sorry to bump myself. but is raid10 *ever* more redundant in btrfs-speak than raid1? I currently use raid1 but i know in mdadm speak raid10 means you can lose 2 drives assuming they aren't the "wrong ones", is it safe to say with btrfs / raid 10 you can only lose one no matter what? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
