Austin S Hemmelgarn <ahferroin7@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > This actually sounds kind of like the issues I have sometimes on my > laptop using btrfs on an SSD, I've mostly resolved them by tuning IO > scheduler parameters, as the default IO scheduler (the supposedly > Completely Fair Queue, which was obviously named by a mathematician > who had never actually run the algorithm) has some pretty brain-dead > default settings. The other thing I would suggest looking into > regarding the variability is tuning the kernel's write-caching > settings Ok, that's something I will examine. I knew CFQ is completely wrong for SSD use, but I thought it was still one of the better schedulers for spinning disks. Apparently that may not be the case. Thanks, Charles -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Charles Cazabon GPL'ed software available at: http://pyropus.ca/software/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
