Re: Terminology (was Re: [PATCH 6/7] Print the summary)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 08:41:31AM +0000, Hugo Mills wrote:
>    As I said at the time, maybe we need to revisit the RAID vocabulary
> completely and move to a more flexible terminology.
> 
>    David -- would you accept the cNsMpP patches if I revisted them?

I personally like the new naming scheme and would like to see it merged,
but I don't know about other devs so more acks are needed. The changes
in code do not apply now, but are fairly easy to forward port so I don't
urge you to do that. I've noticed a few backward compatibility issues
that are not addressed in the patches v2, eg. that the old raid naming
is not accepted in mkfs without an extra option.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux