Re: btrfs is using 25% more disk than it should

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/19/2014 02:59 PM, Daniele Testa wrote:
No, I don't have any snapshots or subvolumes. Only that single file.

The file has both checksums and datacow on it. I will do "chattr +C"
on the parent dir and re-create the file to make sure all files are
marked as "nodatacow".

Should I also turn off checksums with the mount-flags if this
filesystem only contain big VM-files? Or is it not needed if I put +C
on the parent dir?

Please God don't turn off of checksums. Checksums are tracked in metadata anyway, they won't show up in the data accounting. Our csums are 8 bytes per block, so basic math says you are going to max out at 604 megabytes for that big of a file.

Please people try to only take advice from people who know what they are talking about. So unless it's from somebody who has commits in btrfs/btrfs-progs take their feedback with a grain of salt. Thanks,

Josef

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux