-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: btrfs-progs: integration-20141218 possible corruption test
regression
From: WorMzy Tykashi <wormzy.tykashi@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2014年12月19日 02:39
On 18 December 2014 18:35:16 GMT+00:00, WorMzy Tykashi <wormzy.tykashi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi guys,
The latest integration fails 'make test' with the following output:
[TEST] 013-leaf-corruption-no-extent-data.tar.xz
btrfs check should have detected corruption
Makefile:144: recipe for target 'test' failed
make: *** [test] Error 1
rm btrfs-corrupt-block.o
I've only built the progs on a single machine so far, but it
consistently fails at this test.
Cheers,
WorMzy
Regression is present in the 3.18.x branch too.
Cheers,
WorMzy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
In fact, it's not a regression.
The 013 testcase is a special case that uses a script to corrupt the
image and then do the btrfsck test.
There is a patch before the commit, to allow btrfs-progs test script
call corruption script.
But since there is still some discussion about the corruption script and
maybe later verify script,
the previous patch is not picked.
So btrfsck is ran on the *FINE* image without corrupting it, so you
failed the test.
This testcase seems not to be included into 3.18.x soon, so it's not a
problem.
If you still want to test it, please add the following patch as a
temporary fix:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/5490241/
Thanks,
Qu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
